Ronco C, Ricci Z, De Backer D, et al. Renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: controversy and consensus. Crit Care 2015; 19: 146. A review of strategies for RRT in the ICU, including modalities, adverse effects, and approaches for specific clinical situations.
PMID: 25887923
Free Full Text
Vinsonneau C, Camus C, Combes A, et al. Continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration versus intermittent haemodialysis for acute renal failure in patients with multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome. Lancet 2006; 368 :379-85. Like previous RCTs addressing this issue, this multicenter study of 360 ICU patients found no advantage to continuous venovenous dialysis in terms of 60-day survival. A limitation of the study is that the delivered dialysis dose may have been suboptimal for both arms.
PMID: 16876666
Bagshaw SM, Wald R, Adhikari NKJ, et al. Timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. STARRT-AKI Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:240-251. This multicenter RCT of nearly 3,000 patients is the latest to show no mortality benefit to early initiation of dialysis in patients with AKI but no emergent need for dialysis. As with previous studies, patients in the early dialysis group experienced more adverse events and were more likely to be dialysis dependent at 90 days. Unlike similar preceding trials, clinical equipoise on the part of the treating provider was also required for enrollment.
PMID: 32668114
Free Full Text
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Martin-Lefevre L, et al. Comparison of two delayed strategies for renal replacement therapy initiation for severe acute kidney injury (AKIKI 2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2021; 397:1293-1300. This trial compared maximal delay in initiating HD (waiting until an absolute indication or BUN > 140 mg/dl) to initiating HD for oliguria present > 72 hours or BUN > 112 mg/dl. More patients in the maximal-delay group avoided HD (21 vs. 2%), but there was no difference in days free of renal replacement therapy and a multivariable analysis found reduced risk of death in the less-delayed group.
PMID: 33812488
Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, et al; PLUS Study Investigators and the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Balanced multielectrolyte solution versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386:815-826. This large, double-blind, RCT showed no difference in mortality rates or need for dialysis in ICU adults when comparing use of balanced multi-electrolyte solution to normal saline. The groups received similar amounts of fluid following randomization (approximately 3.8 L/patient). This is the second large randomized trial since 2021 (see BaSICS trial below) showing no advantage to using balanced solutions.
PMID: 35041780
Free Full Text
Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al. Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;326:1-12. This large, multicenter trial found no difference between fluid choices in 90-day mortality or need for renal replacement and subgroup analysis revealed worse outcomes with use of balanced crystalloids in patients with traumatic brain injury. Of note, nearly 50% of patients were admitted for elective surgery, 45% had received > 1 liter of fluids prior to enrollment, and patients received a median of only 1.5 L of fluid in the first 24 hours after enrollment.
PMID: 34375394
Free Full Text
